Legal

Connect client service with the systems behind your practice.

Make client intake clearer, reduce repeated administration and connect the systems your people rely on. We help your practice plan and deliver technology improvements around its workflows and responsibilities.

Illustrative legal technology planning scene
Illustrative legal technology planning scene

When we can help

From the first enquiry to ongoing client work, your practice needs timely information and clear handoffs. Disconnected systems, repeated data entry and scattered documents can slow the team and make client updates harder.

We help practices improving intake, connecting matter and document systems, reducing administrative work or planning growth. Technology choices follow the firm’s workflows, existing software and capacity to manage change.

Decisions we help with

We work with your leadership and responsible teams to identify the changes that matter most.

  • Can prospective clients understand your services and make an enquiry easily?
  • Where do intake, administration or document handling slow the team?
  • How do client updates and information requests move between people and systems?
  • Which systems should connect, improve or be replaced?
  • Which administrative or knowledge tasks could benefit from automation or AI with agreed review?
  • What should the practice prioritize before its next technology investment?

How we help

We agree the deliverables around your priorities, software capabilities and practice requirements. Support can include:

Client journeys

  • A map of discovery, enquiry, intake and client updates, showing handoffs, owners and points of delay.
  • Prioritized website, form and communication improvements, with acceptance checks for the agreed journey.

Practice systems

  • A system and information-flow map covering the matter, document and business systems in scope.
  • Integration or migration requirements defining data ownership, access, validation and supplier responsibilities.

Technology direction

  • A phased roadmap and supplier assessment comparing options, costs, dependencies and operating needs.
  • A defined automation or AI evaluation plan where appropriate, with permitted information, review responsibilities and measures of usefulness.

How we work

We agree the scope, information access and review points before work begins. Your practice defines its confidentiality and professional requirements with its responsible specialists; we translate those requirements into the technology work.

  1. Assess the workflows

    InterPro: Map the client and administrative journeys, review existing systems and identify gaps in information flow or ownership.

    Your team: Identify workflow and system owners, explain priorities and provide suitable documentation or examples through agreed access arrangements.

  2. Prioritize the changes

    InterPro: Compare options and define deliverables, dependencies, cost assumptions and acceptance checks.

    Your team: Confirm practice requirements, budget and responsibilities. Review supplier involvement and approve the scope and access needed.

  3. Deliver and validate

    InterPro: Deliver or coordinate the changes included in scope, check agreed workflows and document release and handover responsibilities.

    Your team: Review the work with your providers, approve the release and assign ongoing owners. Professional judgment and approval of client work remain with the practice.

An intake example

Illustrative workflow: a prospective client finds a relevant service page and submits an initial enquiry. A designated team member reviews it, completes the practice’s required checks and decides the next step before approved information is transferred to the appropriate system.

The technology plan would define who receives the enquiry, which information is collected, how status is tracked and what happens if a handoff fails. This is a planning example, not a reported legal-practice engagement.

Measuring progress

We agree measures around the work, such as time to route an enquiry, repeated data entry, failed handoffs and access to approved information. A baseline and review points help the practice assess whether changes are useful.

For AI or automation, evaluation includes the effort needed to check and correct outputs. Access, permitted tasks and approval responsibilities are defined before use.

Common questions

Can you work with our existing practice software?

Yes. We review the current tools, workflows and supported interfaces before recommending changes. Targeted improvements and supplier-supported integrations can be compared with replacement, with responsibilities agreed between your practice, InterPro and providers.

How would a migration be planned?

We identify the records, documents and workflows in scope, then agree mapping, access, validation, interruption tolerance and rollback arrangements. Your practice and responsible providers confirm acceptance before release.

Do you need access to client files to start?

Initial discovery can begin with workflow descriptions, system lists and suitable examples without client details. Any further access is agreed with the practice around the scope and its information-handling requirements. Please omit client records and credentials from the consultation form.

How would AI be evaluated?

We define a specific task, permitted information and review process, then assess results against agreed criteria such as usefulness, errors and checking effort. The practice retains professional judgment and approval of client work; any pilot or implementation is explicitly scoped.

Who is responsible for ongoing support?

The proposal and handover define responsibilities across InterPro, your practice and existing providers. Hosting, licenses, maintenance, monitoring and emergency coverage are included only where agreed.

What should we bring to an initial conversation?

Bring the service or operational priority you want to improve, the systems involved and any timing or budget constraints. A summary of recurring delays or manual handoffs is useful. We agree deliverables, responsibilities, fees and timing in the proposal.

What should work better for your practice?

Tell us which client journey, administrative process or technology decision needs attention. We’ll review your enquiry and contact you to discuss your priorities and a practical next step.

Discuss your practice priorities